My anti-aging formula: No covid vaccine. No mask.Sunlight. Family. Exercise, Organic vegetables. Faith in the ultimate goodness of the universe (in spite of the career of Dr Anthony Fauci).
We need a positive control = NAC without Gly. NAC has been shown to increase GSH in humans, and extends lifespan in rodents. What's not to love? But there have never been trials to show that Gly-NAC is an improvement over NAC alone.
Study size is too small to have a clear conclusion. Drop out rates and unclear endpoints can really skew things. A example of known drop out effects include if a person doesn't improve or feels worse they will drop out of studys at a higher rate than those improving. So if your studying isn't designed well it will amplify benefit effects
All a study size this big can tell you is there might be something worth justifiying gathering the resources for a bigger study.
I found NAC for about $30 for a month supply (that's at 6 grams a day) and Glycine for about $15 for a month supply. So a very affordable $45 a month. At 59 and still involved in competitive sports this might be worth a try.
I'll throw in a complete amino acid supplement which should cover the "patented formulation" contained in Celltrient. Might bring it to $100 a month. Who knows, right?
Since these supplements are available individually and are fairly cheap, it should be easy to try. About $70 a month I think. If the results are as advertised a couple of months should answer the question for anyone inclined to give it a go.
My anti-aging formula: No covid vaccine. No mask.Sunlight. Family. Exercise, Organic vegetables. Faith in the ultimate goodness of the universe (in spite of the career of Dr Anthony Fauci).
We need a positive control = NAC without Gly. NAC has been shown to increase GSH in humans, and extends lifespan in rodents. What's not to love? But there have never been trials to show that Gly-NAC is an improvement over NAC alone.
Nattokinase and serrapeptase extend lives that would end by clot.
Study size is too small to have a clear conclusion. Drop out rates and unclear endpoints can really skew things. A example of known drop out effects include if a person doesn't improve or feels worse they will drop out of studys at a higher rate than those improving. So if your studying isn't designed well it will amplify benefit effects
All a study size this big can tell you is there might be something worth justifiying gathering the resources for a bigger study.
I found NAC for about $30 for a month supply (that's at 6 grams a day) and Glycine for about $15 for a month supply. So a very affordable $45 a month. At 59 and still involved in competitive sports this might be worth a try.
I'll throw in a complete amino acid supplement which should cover the "patented formulation" contained in Celltrient. Might bring it to $100 a month. Who knows, right?
Since these supplements are available individually and are fairly cheap, it should be easy to try. About $70 a month I think. If the results are as advertised a couple of months should answer the question for anyone inclined to give it a go.
My first thoughts are telomeres and circadian rhythm.